A stakeholder argues that opportunity scoring is not objective because the inputs are estimates and the weights are chosen. What is the accurate defence of the practice?

• AThe estimates are accurate enough that the objection does not apply.
• BObjectivity is achieved once enough historical data has been collected.
• CThe objection is correct, so scoring should be replaced by executive judgement.
• DWhat scoring provides is consistency, the same questions asked of every candidate, so two opportunities are compared on the same basis and neither wins on presentation or on who is presenting it.