A product manager has not changed the roadmap in a year and presents this as evidence of a stable strategy. How should this be interpreted?

• AIt means the market is unusually stable or the roadmap is not being informed by anything, and each change should be explainable by naming what was learned.
• BIt is strong evidence of good planning.
• CRoadmaps should be rewritten quarterly regardless of what has been learned.
• DIt means the roadmap horizon is too short.